[CNYBBA-LISTSERV] cram down question

[Louis L. Levine]

is there any  local rule, admin order, standard procedure or practice, etc. concerning the court's review of a reaffirmation which is subject to a presumption of hardship and/or the scheduling of a motion to review/approve same (Section 524(m))?
 

MELVIN & MELVIN, PLLC 
Louis Levine, Esq. 
217 South Salina Street 
Seventh Floor 
Syracuse, New York 13202 
315-422-1311 voice 
315-479-7612 fax 
llevine at melvinlaw.com 

-----Original Message-----
From: cnybba-bounces at cnybba.org [mailto:cnybba-bounces at cnybba.org]On Behalf Of erin
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 3:37 PM
To: CNYBBA at cnybba.org
Subject: [CNYBBA-LISTSERV] cram down question


What's the consensus on cramming down a pop-up travel camper purchased within 910 days of filing?  Is it considered a motor vehicle for puposes under the new 1325(a)?  Is it a "motor vehicle"?  I note that it a tow-hitch camper, not one that can be driven on its own.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/cnybba_cnybba.org/attachments/20060604/5b1c3b56/attachment.html